ATTN JMS: "Severed Dreams": Opinion Without Spoilers

[b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu]

Subject: ATTN JMS: "Severed Dreams": Opinion Without Spoilers
 No.   DATE           FROM
-----+-------------+--------------------------------------------------
+  1: Apr  6, 1996: denebeim at deepthot.cary.nc.us (Jay Denebeim)
*  2: Apr  6, 1996: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: denebeim at deepthot.cary.nc.us (Jay Denebeim)
Lines: 19

In article <4k3lno$c9j at tnn-wan.trw.com>,
Michael West <mike.west at trw.com> wrote:

>Let me add a second to this. Severed Dreams is OUTSTANDING. My only problem? 
>There seemed to be more commercials than usual! I was so frustrated I nearly 
>threw a brick through my TV waiting impatiently for the show to resume. But make 
>no mistake this was one of the 2 or 3 most outstanding shows of the series. I 
>can hardly wait till tonight when I replay the episode!

Nope, running time was the same as usual, however, there appeared to
be more LOCAL spots in it. 

(JMS, that true?)

Jay
-- 
Jay Denebeim			denebeim at deepthot.cary.nc.us
				duke.edu!wolves!deepthot!denebeim
Fuck censorship!  Oh *shit* there goes another 100, er $200,000

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Lines: 7

Yes, the number of commercials were the same; no idea if there were more
or less local spots than usual, but I'd doubt it.


 jms


-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Messages to this list come from various sources.
-*** Replies to them, automatically to go the maintainer of this list
-*** <b5jms-owner at majordomo.cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply to
-*** someone else, make sure the "To:" header line is correctly set.