SFX has a dig. Again...

[B5JMS Poster]

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: "Shaz" <hypatia at Dial.pipex.com>
Date: 3 Jul 2000 18:12:59 -0600
Lines: 27


"Jms at B5" <jmsatb5 at aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000703200135.12318.00000059 at ng-fg1.aol.com...
> >Is there any "sadness" (probably a bad word, but can't think of a
> >better one at the mo. - "regret" maybe?) about subsequent efforts not
> >being as meaningful as the first, or does it really get reduced to
> >just jobbing work?
> >
>
> Don't take one person's impressions -- especially one speaking as a
non-writer
> -- as necessarily accurate.  If every new thing I wrote wasn't as
meaningful to
> me as the last thing, or the first thing that I wrote, I'd get out of the
> business.
>
> Because at that point you've got no business being IN the business.
>
>  jms

I assume you're talking about Gharlane there, not Tom who's a very
successful writer (been reading some of his stuff myself lately. Hilarious!)

Shaz




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 3 Jul 2000 18:33:57 -0600
Lines: 20

>I assume you're talking about Gharlane there, not Tom who's a very
>successful writer (been reading some of his stuff myself lately. Hilarious!)

Then I must apologize; I was referring to Tom's message, and didn't know he was
a working writer.  His work, I confess, is unfamiliar to me.  Nonetheless, the
error there was mine.

 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com
(all message content (c) 2000 by
synthetic worlds, ltd., permission
to reprint specifically denied to
SFX Magazine)




-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages go to the list maintainer,
-*** <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply elsewhere, adjust
-*** the "To" field.  See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/b5jms/ for all
-*** other information about this list.