ATTN JMS: SFC fudging the deal?

[B5JMS Poster]

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: kensu at madison.tdsnet.com (Chris Schumacher)
Date: 8 May 2000 16:26:38 -0600
Lines: 18


I was just reading a "report" on a Crusade that brought an interesting
"fact" to light.

Is it true that one of the reasons why you weren't able to sell
Crusade to SFC back in 98/99 was because they wanted the B5 rights
too, and TNT was asking an exhorbant fee for them in an attempt to
kill any possible deal?

If so, now that SFC has what they wanted, is there a chance that they
might shell out for a continuation?

Thanks.

					-==Kensu==-
A Crusade crusader.
Who would've imagined that life would've imitated art like this?


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 8 May 2000 22:55:01 -0600
Lines: 27

>Is it true that one of the reasons why you weren't able to sell
>Crusade to SFC back in 98/99 was because they wanted the B5 rights
>too, and TNT was asking an exhorbant fee for them in an attempt to
>kill any possible deal?

I've heard statements to that effect, but I was not in the room so I can't
personally confirm them.  

>If so, now that SFC has what they wanted, is there a chance that they
>might shell out for a continuation?
>

I think they'd much rather see what happens with B5 for a while first.

 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com
(all message content (c) 2000 by
synthetic worlds, ltd., permission
to reprint specifically denied to
SFX Magazine)




-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages go to the list maintainer,
-*** <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply elsewhere, adjust
-*** the "To" field.  See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/b5jms/ for all
-*** other information about this list.