Why the *Trek* bashing?

[B5JMS Poster]

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E5l?= Are Nordal <a_blip at bigfoot.com>
Date: 17 Oct 2000 13:12:53 -0700
Lines: 24

JBONETATI wrote:
>=20
> So...what's your point?

O. Dues' points are that Trek r000lezzz, B5 suxxxx and everybody who
thinks differently are pathetic morons. He's just calmed down a bit
since his fits on rec.arts.sf.tv and rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5, presumably
so that he'll get through the moderation.

So in his and Ford's honour (who also has been pointing in B5's "low"
ratings on Sci-Fi), I'd like to point out that the ratings have been
increasing, the latest being 0.8 - close to what Lexx got for a while.

If this keeps up, B5 will soon be in the league of Sci-Fi's first-run
programing ratings wise.

--=20
Donate free food with a simple click: http://www.thehungersite.com/

P=E5l Are Nordal
a_blip at bigfoot.com




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 17 Oct 2000 14:40:50 -0700
Lines: 22

>I'd like to point out that the ratings have been
>increasing, the latest being 0.8 - close to what Lexx got for a while.
>If this keeps up, B5 will soon be in the league of Sci-Fi's first-run
>programing ratings wise.

According to the ratings reports I've been getting from SFC, the show is now
the #8 ranked series on SFC.  (Their first run series, The Invisible Man, ranks
12th.)

We're already there.

 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2000 by
synthetic worlds, ltd., permission
to reprint specifically denied to
SFX Magazine)




-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages go to the list maintainer,
-*** <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply elsewhere, adjust
-*** the "To" field.  See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/b5jms/ for all
-*** other information about this list.