Ratings; Ending Credits - Chrysalis; Start time

[B5JMS Poster]

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: "Orwell" <moelawn at yahoo.com>
Date: 30 Oct 2000 23:32:55 -0700
Lines: 12

Ratings:  Anybody have any information regarding the Sci-fi channel's
ratings for B5?

Ending credits:  Anyone notice Sci-fi allowed the ending credits to run at
the end of Chrysalis?  I thought that was a nice thing to do.

On the other hand, am I mistaken or did Sci-fi start the Chrysalis tape a
few minutes early?





=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 30 Oct 2000 23:44:28 -0700
Lines: 31

>Ratings:  Anybody have any information regarding the Sci-fi channel's
>ratings for B5?

The ratings are holding rock solid on B5.  For the last five weeks, they look
like this:

0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7

Prior shows in that timeslot averaged .4 to .6 (and oddly enough we've doubled
the ratings for kids and teens in that timeslot) and it bumps up every time
from its lead-in.

For some kind of comparison, the most recent list of SFC shows that I've seen
puts B5 in the top 10 (#4 to be exact), well ahead of most of SFC's original
programming.

 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2000 by
synthetic worlds, ltd., permission
to reprint specifically denied to
SFX Magazine)




-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages go to the list maintainer,
-*** <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply elsewhere, adjust
-*** the "To" field.  See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/b5jms/ for all
-*** other information about this list.