ATTN JMS:IGN (Filmforce) Interview

B5JMS Poster b5jms-owner at shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu
Thu Sep 14 04:57:38 EDT 2000


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: bretntraci at aol.com (BRETNTRACI)
Date: 13 Sep 2000 16:26:13 -0700
Lines: 8

>Wouldn't work.  It's a status thing.  Shows tumble down from network to
>syndication or cable, they don't swim upstream from syndie/cable to network. 
>Just not done.

Instead of going up stream why not make a lateral move and go back into first
run syndication. WB seemed supportive of the show so why not go back to where
B5 started out?


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 13 Sep 2000 21:16:13 -0700
Lines: 22

>Instead of going up stream why not make a lateral move and go back into first
>run syndication. WB seemed supportive of the show so why not go back to where
>B5 started out?

Because the syndication market today is not the syndication market that existed
6+ years ago...UPN and Fox and Tribune have snapped up nearly all of the
available stations, and it's extremely hard to get a berth in what's left
without giving up financial aspects that WB won't give up on any of its shows.

 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com
(all message content (c) 2000 by
synthetic worlds, ltd., permission
to reprint specifically denied to
SFX Magazine)




-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages go to the list maintainer,
-*** <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply elsewhere, adjust
-*** the "To" field.  See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/b5jms/ for all
-*** other information about this list.



More information about the B5JMS mailing list