I'm Amazed

[B5JMS Poster]

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: "Douglas Nicol" <Douglasnicol at btinternet.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2001 15:09:44 -0700
Lines: 26

Is it not possible that there's still a sort of 'snobbery ' against Science
Fiction?   It seems a bit daft but there you go.

Douglas

Mac Breck <macbreck at access995.com> wrote in message
news:019801c07d98$15c97880$a3d4c997 at cobweb.net...
>     [ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
>     [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
>     [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
>
> After watching Vir and Londo in Vir's quarters after Cartagia's death (and
> NUMEROUS other B5 scenes), I'm amazed how Babylon 5 has not been awarded
> TONS of Emmy and Golden Globe awards for acting and writing.
>
> I can only conclude that the people who vote on such awards must have
> rigorously avoided watching Babylon 5 upon penalty of death.
>
> This is an oversight of galactic proportions.
>
> Mac
>
>




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 14 Jan 2001 16:12:24 -0700
Lines: 16

>Is it not possible that there's still a sort of 'snobbery ' against Science
>Fiction?   It seems a bit daft but there you go.

That's precisely the reason.  The academy never takes SF seriously.

 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2000 by
synthetic worlds, ltd., permission
to reprint specifically denied to
SFX Magazine)




-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages go to the list maintainer,
-*** <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply elsewhere, adjust
-*** the "To" field.  See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/b5jms/ for all
-*** other information about this list.