[B5JMS] No more Crusade?

b5jms-admin at cs.columbia.edu b5jms-admin at cs.columbia.edu
Fri Mar 30 04:23:03 EST 2001


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: Michael Harper <bahiamar at bellsouth.net>
Date: 29 Mar 2001 21:22:23 -0700
Lines: 17

Joe;

I heard a rumor that the main reason there won't be any new Crusade
episodes is that the cast can't be reassembled. I doubt this is the
reason, since SFC will probably want to wait for the ratings breakdowns
first, see how things are going to go, then crank up new episodes if it
looks good. I know you well enough to know that you won't abandon
Crusade for no reason. Am I right, or not?

BTW, the Russian cabby Star Wars "needs salt" story has been
disseminated far and wide around here, mainly due to me, and most
fannish types agree with Boris or whatever his name was...

Mike




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 30 Mar 2001 00:12:13 -0700
Lines: 23

>I heard a rumor that the main reason there won't be any new Crusade
>episodes is that the cast can't be reassembled.

Untrue.

>I doubt this is the
>reason, since SFC will probably want to wait for the ratings breakdowns
>first, see how things are going to go, then crank up new episodes if it
>looks good. 

That would certainly be the more logical approach.


 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2001 by synthetic worlds, ltd., 
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine 
and don't send me story ideas)







More information about the B5JMS mailing list