[B5JMS] LOL at JMS' comments on ASM #36

[b5jms-admin at cs.columbia.edu]

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Unavailable article: Message-ID <3c37fffd.1588784 at news.earthlink.net>

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lines: 30
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 06 Jan 2002 08:24:55 GMT

>But isn't that the same thing you're doing here?  Denigrating those
>fans by telling them to get out of their parent's basement and quit
>breeding?  They've expressed an opinion that *you* don't agree with,
>and your intelligent response is to insult them and dismiss their
>opinion as being wrong or laughable?
>
>Grow up, Joe.
>

Of course, by doing what you just did,  and ending as you ended, your response
is to insult me and dismiss my opinion as being wrong or laughable.

If you're going to pillory me for doing something, does it not necessitate that
you not do these things yourself?  Because if it is uancceptable behavior, then
clearly you would not do it yourself.  If you do it yourself, then it must be,
by your lights, acceptable behavior, and thus not grounds for pillorying,
tarring, feathering or dead catting.  You cannot disagree with what you
yourself practice.

Consistency in all things, yes?

 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2001 by synthetic worlds, ltd., 
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine 
and don't send me story ideas)