[B5JMS] ATTN JMS: Handing over Jeremiah reigns questions (short I
b5jms at cs.columbia.edu
b5jms at cs.columbia.edu
Tue Dec 16 04:26:37 EST 2003
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: janmschroeder at aol.com (Jan)
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:38:34 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 22
JMS wrote:
>Emblematic of some of the studio's notions is a call made by the studio to my
>casting director, stating -- of the paucity of babes -- "I don't care if she
>can act, I want her cute."
Another Charlie Brown moment: Oh Good Grief! Isn't there some kind of
protocol, though, who the studio should be making calls to/giving notes?
I'd've thought that sort of direction should only be given to the Producer
level at the lowest?
<<If there were a third season, the studio would have to pay me a consultancy
fee
but there would be no requirement to actually consult.>>
Ignorant question here: Why?
Must say, Joe, that this second season is just wonderful.
Thanks,
Jan
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 06:38:20 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 31
>Another Charlie Brown moment: Oh Good Grief! Isn't there some kind of
>protocol, though, who the studio should be making calls to/giving notes?
>I'd've thought that sort of direction should only be given to the Producer
>level at the lowest?
Yup. Therein lay the silhouette of the problem.
><<If there were a third season, the studio would have to pay me a consultancy
>fee
>but there would be no requirement to actually consult.>>
>
>Ignorant question here: Why?
>
A very well written contract.
>Must say, Joe, that this second season is just wonderful.
>
Thanks, I think it came out really well.
jms
(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2003 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)
More information about the B5JMS
mailing list