[LUGSB] Constitution and USG meeting today

[Benjamin Bannier]

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:47:55 -0400
"Jonathan Dehan" <jdehan at gmail.com> wrote:

> I would like to go and propose the new constitution, but still would
> want someone with more experience (with both USG and LUGSB) to come
> too.

I think it is not much less vague than before. Section VI.4 is a nice
idea, but maybe a bit overkill ... I don't even know if I am a member in
the language of the constitution, nor do I care much ...

Let's keep it simple and go with Avishay's suggestion in
1207117236.11542.20.camel at rockstar.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu.

> I could not send the actual documents to the mailing list because it
> was too big and awaits 'moderator approval'. Attached is the
> plaintext. Sections 2 and 6.4 are of note.

No offence, but just send something like a plaintext diff next time.


b

-- 
"If we had asked people what they wanted they would have said 'a  
faster horse'."  --Henry Ford