[Unionfs] Problems with 1.1.3

[Josef Sipek]

Sorry for the slow response. We are currently working on a Ottawa Linux
Symposium paper (http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2006/) about Unionfs and
our goals/trek toward kernel inclusion.

On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:31:25PM +0100, Torsten Luettgert wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I cannot use 2.6.16 yet so I used 2.6.15 with unionfs 1.1.3 until now.
> Here is a transcript which reproduces the problem:

Yeah, that looks like a bug. can you try to use 2.6.16 with latest CVS
snapshot verify that it is still a problem, and then retry the test with
UNIONFS_DELETE_ALL?

Thanks,
Jeff Sipek.