JMS: are Monks flip-side of technomages?

b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu
Thu Nov 23 07:05:46 EST 1995


Subject: JMS: are Monks flip-side of technomages?
+  1: Nov 19, 1995: dbarber at crash.cts.com (David C. Barber)
   2: Nov 20, 1995: strueb at aol.com (Strueb)
   3: Nov 21, 1995: markduell at aol.com (MarkDuell)
+  4: Nov 22, 1995: strueb at aol.com (Strueb)
*  5: Nov 22, 1995: straczynski at genie.geis.com

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: dbarber at crash.cts.com (David C. Barber)
Lines: 18


Joe,

In the monks that just arrived, we have a *highly* trained pool of 
technical people with no allegence to any power structure, and offering 
to help.  This seems *immensely* useful, and much like the flip-side to 
the technomages.  (These monks strike me has having the technical skills 
to go down and repair the machine buried on the planet below, if it 
required maintance, and as such, should prove a resource of great value 
to Sheridan.)

Is this the way they should be thought of?

Thanks!

Without Faith                           *David C. Barber*
   nothing else has value                dbarber at cts.com


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: strueb at aol.com (Strueb)
Lines: 24

In article <48regt$rua at newsbf02.news.aol.com>, markduell at aol.com
(MarkDuell) writes:

>
>Wes, Wes, Wes,
>
>     I don't think David has said anything here that requires Spoilers. 
>Nothing was said that divulges direction in the plot.  Yes, spoilers are
>important in this newsgroup, but this is a bit of a stretch.
>
>Mark
>
>

Mark, Mark, Mark.  Thanks...<G>

I don't know how much our UK friends have seen (though thinking about it
there has been Theo postings and Dominican/Jesuit postings for a while,
now, so probably no harm done).  I'd just rather be overprotective. 
Y'know, mother-hen (father-hen?) syndrome?

Anyway, you're probably right...

Wes Struebing

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: straczynski at genie.geis.com
Lines: 5

      No, I wouldn't think of them in technomage terms; if you look at the
history of many of these orders, they've generally pulled together people
of varying skills.  Ain't really that new an idea....

                                                                 jms



More information about the B5JMS mailing list