Question about JMS participation

[b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu]

Subject: Question about JMS participation
 No.   DATE           FROM
-----+-------------+--------------------------------------------------
+  1: Apr  4, 1996: stewart at bae.bellcore.com (Peter Stewart)
*  2: Apr  4, 1996: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: stewart at bae.bellcore.com (Peter Stewart)
Lines: 18

I asked something similar to this in the other newsgroup, but I figured I'd
repost here and help test the moderation software.

In the old group, before JMS left, we could direct posts to his attention
by placing "ATTN JMS" in the subject line. Is that procedure still in effect
for this new group, or is some other method to be used? Or will JMS be
looking at all posts now that he doesn't have to do end runs around flammage
and story ideas?

BTW, welcome back, JMS :)

Pete

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pete Stewart               | "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent"
stewart at bae.bellcore.com   |    - Salvor Hardin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Lines: 12

What I generally do when I log onto the group is look first for any
messages tagged ATT JMS; once I've run through those, I make my way
through the rest.  I tend to give first attention to main headers,
secondary to followup (RE:) messages, just for reasons of time.

So yes, the ATT still works, as long as it's used when appropriate.



 jms


-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Messages to this list come from various sources.
-*** Replies to them, automatically to go the maintainer of this list
-*** <b5jms-owner at majordomo.cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply to
-*** someone else, make sure the "To:" header line is correctly set.