ATTN JMS A Note and a Compliment

[b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu]

Subject: ATTN JMS A Note and a Compliment
 No.   DATE           FROM
-----+-------------+--------------------------------------------------
+  1: Apr  6, 1996: "Michael S. Bonnardel" <bonnmic at charlie.acc.iit.edu>
*  2: Apr  7, 1996: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: "Michael S. Bonnardel" <bonnmic at charlie.acc.iit.edu>
Lines: 20

No spoliers here.
I would like to say this is the first episode in a long time (if not
ever) that I have heard non-B5 fans comented on and rave about.
It is true some of them watch a little SF but not to a great extent or
were huge fans of the show but around my school (yes it is a tech 
school) "normal" people were discussing it....yeah some of the 
conversation was about the special effects and how great there were.
But some people were also mentioning about the plot as well.
A couple of them commmented that they watched more religously perviously
so they would have had a better understanding of it all.
I just wish to thank you for the unreal episode and for bringing the
public back into Babylon 5.  If we didn't bring the public back soon, I
was afraid that the "dream given form" would not be completed but after
this episode I think we have the viewing public back on our side.
Thanks again and keep up the good work.
					- Mike
P.S. Your publist sent me some info and I HTMLized it and posted it on my 
web site.  Please have them continue sending the stuff and if there is
anything you like to see in addition let me know.
					- msb

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Lines: 7

Mike: thanks.  I think this one is gonna cross a LOT of lines.



 jms


-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Messages to this list come from various sources.
-*** Replies to them, automatically to go the maintainer of this list
-*** <b5jms-owner at majordomo.cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply to
-*** someone else, make sure the "To:" header line is correctly set.