ATTN JMS: Shadows' motives?

[B5JMS Poster]

Subject: ATTN JMS: Shadows' motives?
-----+-------------+--------------------------------------------------
 No. | DATE        |  FROM
-----+-------------+--------------------------------------------------
+  1: Aug  4, 1996: Stephen Langasek <wakko at stf.org>
*  2: Aug  4, 1996: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: Stephen Langasek <wakko at stf.org>
Lines: 8

Joe, you've said that roughly 1/3 of us will agree with the Shadows' motives, when 
they become known.  I was wondering, which side do *you* fall on?  Do you agree with 
the Shadows motives?
 
                                 -Steve, hoping he hasn't posted a redundant question
-doink-



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Lines: 12

"Do you agree with the Shadows motives?"

Sometimes I do, sometimes I don't.  Motives are one thing; the means to
achieving that motive, however, are a different issue.  And those means I
do not agree with.  But on some level, their motives can make sense...as
can the Vorlons' motives....


 jms



-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages in this list go to the list
-*** maintainer, <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply
-*** elsewhere, adjust the "To" field.  The best way to reach JMS is to post
-*** to rastb5m, which can be done by sending email to <rastb5 at solon.com>.