ATTN JMS:parrots:(was:Advice for other online producers?)
B5JMS Poster
b5jms-owner at shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu
Wed Aug 14 06:19:22 EDT 1996
Subject: ATTN JMS:parrots:(was:Advice for other online producers?)
-----+-------------+--------------------------------------------------
No. | DATE | FROM
-----+-------------+--------------------------------------------------
+ 1: Aug 11, 1996: kogutt at colorado.edu (SCAVENGER)
+ 3: Aug 12, 1996: gharlane at ccshp1.ccs.csus.edu (Gharlane of Eddore)
* 4: Aug 13, 1996: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
+ 11: Aug 13, 1996: news at ssbunews.ih.lucent.com
* 12: Aug 13, 1996: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: kogutt at colorado.edu (SCAVENGER)
Lines: 19
on who they are until one day, after exchanging private or public
> mail, the dog satellite goes by overhead and they turn on you viciously,
> start spreading rumors, attacking you in public...and you realize that
> yep, this person has a parrot up his ass.
>
This is why I love Babylon 5! Not the great acting...not the intricate
storytelling...no the innovative setting...no!! It's cuz the creator
says things like "This person has a parrot up his ass."!!!
---SCAVENGER..soory....this was just way funny
--
"You cannot live your life by the outmoded class conventions of the
neo-imperialist society. Find your true center!" ___________________________
"What? You mean Zen piracy?" --The Pirate Movie |SCAVENGER / Nikodemus |
Non Tenete Paenitentias | kogutt at colorado.edu |
----------------------- ---------------------------
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: gharlane at ccshp1.ccs.csus.edu (Gharlane of Eddore)
Lines: 24
JMS> on who they are until one day, after exchanging private or public
JMS> mail, the dog satellite goes by overhead and they turn on you viciously,
JMS> start spreading rumors, attacking you in public...and you realize that
JMS> yep, this person has a parrot up his ass.
JMS>
In <kogutt-1008962333090001 at tele-anx0248.colorado.edu>
kogutt at colorado.edu (SCAVENGER) writes:
>
> This is why I love Babylon 5! Not the great acting...not the intricate
> storytelling...no the innovative setting...no!! It's cuz the creator
> says things like "This person has a parrot up his ass."!!!
>
And the funniest part of all is, JMS actively supports the party and
the individual politicians who brought you the "Communications Decency Act,"
which would, if it hadn't been hamstrung by a court which had actually
read the Constitution, have resulted in eventual restraint of such modes
of expression.......
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Lines: 81
"And the funniest part of all is, JMS actively supports the party and the
individual politicians who brought you the "Communications Decency Act,"
which would, if it hadn't been hamstrung by a court which had actually
read the Constitution, have resulted in eventual restraint of such modes
of expression......"
That's right, Gharlane. I supported the individuals now residing in the
White House, and still do...because I'm not a one-issue person. Is the
CDA a stupid, invidious, badly written, paranoid, neanderthal, repressive
bill? Absolutely. And I supported the people who were actively against
it, as I was actively against it. I don't have this notion that I must
agree 100% with a politician, or have that politican hew to every single
belief which I hold, in order to support him or her. There can be
respectful (or loud) disagreements on principle on individual points.
The issue is: *on balance*, which side do I tend to support? Both parties
are flawed. Candidates on both sides have eccentricities, failings,
misfired notions. But on balance...you've got Bob Dole, who doesn't have
any notion on the leadership of this country except the vague idea that
he's *earned* his shot, and he's going to have it. It's not about
providing a new vision, it's just about being the one wearing the pointy
hat. He wants the ultimate promotion.
Kemp I find interesting, but saddled with Dole this is a non-starter. And
from where I sit the Republican party has capitulated to the Religious
Right on every issue of substance...people who've said they want to
designate this a Christian nation, drag creationism into the schools
(saying they want balance, but I don't see anybody offering to let folks
teach Darwin from the church pulpit on Saturday nights), who've whipped up
so much hatred against physicians and classes that murdering doctors is
simply an unfortunate consequence....
Are there flaws to the Democratic side? Absolutely. An inability to come
to grips with social programs long in need of serious reform, a
soft-hearted and sometimes soft-headed approach to social organization,
de-emphasis on infrastructure in deference to social programming, too much
concern about words and not enough concern about actions, grass-roots
disorganization....
You say you're a fan of this show. Well, consider this: that if the
government envisioned by Phyllis Schlafly and Pat Buchanan and Robert Dole
and Bob Dornan and Alfonse D'Amato (possible spelling error there) ever
took serious hold in this nation, Babylon 5 -- with its sometimes
subversive nature, its open and frank discussions on religion, death,
sexuality, violence, the conflict between belief and medicine -- would be
the first program chucked out the door.
It was under the Reagan years that the Captain Power series -- for all its
flaws, some episodes very good, some less so -- got shot out from under
the producers because of the then-fashionable assault on violent TV by
pressure groups (many of them on the far right), so don't tell me it can't
happen...I was the one on the opposite side of the conference table when
religious-right "consultants" on Satanism advised the network on another
show where I was working on what they had to do to avoid sending
unintentional Satanic messages, which meant leaving out references to
fictional books like the Necronomicon, being unable to use the name
Lovecraft, and being told that the signs of a kid succumbing to Satanism
are "he's curious...he's sometimes depressed...he tries to reject
authority...and he's susceptiple to peer pressure." No, I'm NOT making
that up, that's verbatim.
And these are the same groups bending the Republican party to their own
whims. I've seen their work up-close and personal, and I tell you
frankly, that if they got in charge, this show would be deep-sixed so fast
it'd make your head spin.
The present administration may be muffin-headed at times, may have its
personal pecadillos and quirks...but compared to the mean, venal,
anti-intellectual, anti-artist opposition, the opposition of Jesse Helms
and Pat Buchanan...I'll take it, and be glad of it, and when something as
inherently dopey and destructive as the CDA gets passed, be absolutely
open in complaining about it.
And thank you for dragging my personal politics back into this...and
throwing it in my face. Anything else you'd like to drag up?
jms
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: news at ssbunews.ih.lucent.com
Lines: 32
The Great Maker wrote:
: Kemp I find interesting, but saddled with Dole this is a non-starter. And
: from where I sit the Republican party has capitulated to the Religious
: Right on every issue of substance...people who've said they want to
: designate this a Christian nation, drag creationism into the schools
: (saying they want balance, but I don't see anybody offering to let folks
: teach Darwin from the church pulpit on Saturday nights), .....
In article <4uqe2j$rc7 at mercury.intnet.net>, Al Lipscomb <arl at IntNet.net> wrote:
>I find your logic slipping a bit. First off to compare what is wanted in
>the teachings of the _public_ schools against what is done in the
>_private_ church is flawed. What is done with government money is well
>within the right of the people to voice their opinion on.
Ah, but part of the problem is also that the Religious Right doesn't want
just *any* view of creationism taught, but *their* view. It doesn't take
into account the wide variety of religions and *their* view of how the world
was created. Take a look at "Parliament of Dreams" at the very end and the
long line of people representing the various religions on earth. Which
version of creationism do you teach? If you pick the Judeo/Christian
version you play favorites with some religions over others. That's one very
good reason to keep creationism in the churches. Plus, it helps maintain
the separation of church and state. If you want creationism in school, go
to a private school.
--
JRP
"BLONDE? Blonde? You didn't TELL me you were a blonde....."
--Gharlane of Eddore
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Lines: 62
"I find your logic slipping a bit. First off to compare what is wanted in
the teachings of the _public_ schools against what is done in the
_private_ church is flawed. What is done with government money is well
within the right of the people to voice their opinion on."
Except, of course, that the churches have *tax exempt* status, on the
theory that they are separate and apart from the State...yet have been
mingling more and more in politics. I'm absolutely deleriously happy if
they want to get into politics, but then drop the tax exempt status. So
given that the church is getting a free ride with our government money, as
you say above, it's well within the right of the people to voice their
opinion on (dangling participle notwithstanding).
Basically...make up your mind. Do you want to be involved with partisan
politics? Do you want to be a part of the State, as many folks now want
to make this a Christian nation? Then start carrying your fair share of
the tax burden. It's not fair to say, "we deserve to interfere with
government," then when the tax man comes around say, "we deserve to be
separate from the government." Choose one.
"While it is very tragic that "doctors" have been killed over this issue,
what I know
as fact makes me understand it a bit."
That you have put "doctors" in quotes, and indicated you can understand
the wanton murder of civilians, tells me you have just struck your colors.
So if you knew a baby was going to grow up to be a doctor, who provided
abortion services, would it be okay to abort *that* baby, or just wait
until they're older and kill 'em then? May as well be efficient, save
college loan money and the like, yes?
And while I see anti-abortion groups lobbying for that aspect, I don't see
many of them offering to adopt crack babies, or babies that are the result
of incest or rape, or funding social services for all the infants that
will be born if they get their way. Pass every law you can think of to
make sure they're born, protect those rights... then toss 'em aside after
their born. Sure, that makes sense. Why didn't I see it before?
"Are the "..." sequences a pause or are you leaving out text? For example
,was the quote "he's curious about death, he's sometimes depressed to the
point of talking about suicide, he tries to reject authority by openly
experimenting with drugs....". All of these would be bad signs."
No, I said I'm quoting verbatim...verbatim means as said, unedited. They
didn't say that a bad sign was that he's curious about death, just that
he's *curious*, that he's sometimes depressed, and that he listens to
heavy metal music (I forgot that one), and that he rejects authority.
Broad-based statements.
The religious right uses fear tactics on a daily basis to get what it
wants. To describe what they've actually done isn't fear tactics, it's
strictly reporting what happened. If you find it scary...well, so do I.
jms
-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages in this list go to the list
-*** maintainer, <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>. If you want to reply
-*** elsewhere, adjust the "To" field. The best way to reach JMS is to post
-*** to rastb5m, which can be done by sending email to <rastb5 at solon.com>.
More information about the B5JMS
mailing list