"ATTN JMS:A ratings question"

[B5JMS Poster]

Subject: "ATTN JMS:A ratings question"
-----+-------------+--------------------------------------------------
 No. | DATE        |  FROM
-----+-------------+--------------------------------------------------
s  1: Oct 23, 1996: gaa at cctimes.com
*  2: Oct 24, 1996: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: gaa at cctimes.com
Lines: 4

Anything new on ratings after three new U.S. eps?

Best,
George Avalos

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Lines: 17

No, nothing new, and I'm really kinda bugged about it.  Because of the
TNT/WB merger, most of our people over at WB who used to give us the
ratings aren't there anymore or have been shifted over to other
divisions...they don't like taking the time to give each individual show
they work on the ratings breakdown because it takes up too much of their
time.  

The only figure I've heard so far was the overall national (final) rating
on the first new episode, which was a 3.2, which is great for coming back.
 The station by station figures I've seen for the second week are higher,
so the overall should be higher, but until they see fit to tell me, I can
only guess, and the trades don't usually publish comprehensive lists.  


 jms


-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages in this list go to the list
-*** maintainer, <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply
-*** elsewhere, adjust the "To" field.  The best way to reach JMS is to post
-*** to rastb5m, which can be done by sending email to <rastb5 at solon.com>.