ATTN JMS: *sigh* a quick Question
B5JMS Poster
b5jms-owner at shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu
Fri Oct 29 04:27:11 EDT 1999
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jbonetati at aol.com (JBONETATI)
Date: 28 Oct 1999 04:06:54 -0600
Lines: 13
And here, folks I think we can see a good example of just how good a writer Joe
is; by my way of thinking he's calling these people idiots several times in
this memo but I doubt they ever caught it.
Joe, it sounds like these notes were coming from several people and directions.
Would it have been a reasonable request that TNT filter them all through one
person? Theoretically, this might have put that person in the position of
ensuring some consistance?
Thanks,
Jan
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 28 Oct 1999 18:52:50 -0600
Lines: 20
>Joe, it sounds like these notes were coming from several people and
>directions.
>Would it have been a reasonable request that TNT filter them all through one
>person? Theoretically, this might have put that person in the position of
>ensuring some consistance?
That was *precisely* the problem. The LA office wanted the exposition stuff,
and the Atlanta office wanted the action/sex stuff, and we were constantly
caught in the switches. We tried constantly to get them to speak with one
voice; it never worked.
jms
(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com
-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages go to the list maintainer,
-*** <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>. If you want to reply elsewhere, adjust
-*** the "To" field. See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/b5jms/ for all
-*** other information about this list.
More information about the B5JMS
mailing list