on lbx copies from jms

[B5JMS Poster]

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: earlej at hotmail.com
Date: 21 Nov 2000 21:12:32 -0700
Lines: 19

jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5) spewed:

>Just to let folks know...Doug and I have gotten into the situation, and have
>been working with both WB and SFC to straighten the situation out.  WB has
>finally backtracked the problem, and will be taking steps shortly, as in the
>coming week or two, to fix it and begin the process of providing new (and
>proper) widescreen copies.  

Does this mean that the loss of picture and sound quality will also be
addressed for the corrected eps?  S1, while technically might have
been proper widescreen, didn't have the picture and audio quality of
the 4:3 copies that TNT ran.

Cheers!
Jon
---

Fighting a holy war is like killing each other over who has the better invisible friend.


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 21 Nov 2000 23:59:19 -0700
Lines: 18

>Does this mean that the loss of picture and sound quality will also be
>addressed for the corrected eps?  S1, while technically might have
>been proper widescreen, didn't have the picture and audio quality of
>the 4:3 copies that TNT ran.

I had that conversation today.  They know my feelings about it.

 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2000 by
synthetic worlds, ltd., permission
to reprint specifically denied to
SFX Magazine)




-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages go to the list maintainer,
-*** <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply elsewhere, adjust
-*** the "To" field.  See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/b5jms/ for all
-*** other information about this list.