[B5JMS] Attn JMS: taste; was: various bounced replies from jms

[b5jms-admin at cs.columbia.edu]

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: "M.E.Tonkin" <met314 at erols.com>
Date: 27 Feb 2001 17:04:36 -0700
Lines: 19



Jms at B5 wrote:
> 
> >So, you're saying that Milton's *Paradise Lost* should be shelved in the
> >Christian
> >section of the bookstore, rather than in poetry or classics?
> 
> No.  Please do not put words in my mouth, I have enough trouble with the ones
> that get there on their own.
> 
> I did not say, or imply, any such thing.
> 

Since I'm not the only person who made that inference - and no, we're not in
collusion -  you might want to go back and read what you wrote again.

MET


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 27 Feb 2001 22:41:58 -0700
Lines: 21

>Since I'm not the only person who made that inference - and no, we're not in
>collusion -  you might want to go back and read what you wrote again.

I know what I wrote, and it had nothing to do with the inference you raise
here. The problem is that one knee-jerk response fuels the next knee-jerk
response.

I never, ever said that books by Lewis should be isolated in the religion area.
 Didn't say it, or imply it.  I'm not liable for escalating misinterpretations
that fuel each other into hysteria.

 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2001 by synthetic worlds, ltd., 
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine 
and don't send me story ideas)




-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages go to the list maintainer,
-*** <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>.  If you want to reply elsewhere, adjust
-*** the "To" field.  See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/b5jms/ for all
-*** other information about this list.