[B5JMS] Jerry Doyle hopeful of B5 revival

[b5jms at cs.columbia.edu]

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: Robert Perkins <rob_perkins at hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:04:04 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 27

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 23:44:57 +0000 (UTC), jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
wrote:

>He probably won't like that I said this any more than he did the last time, but
>then as now, I have to put out the facts and let the passage of time validate
>them.

But then there is the notion (maybe not the fact) that your word at an
early stage can make the investors go away: "Joe stated publicly that
you don't have all the pieces, so why should I fund it?" Or, worse
(and not true based on what you wrote here), "Joe said you didn't have
all the pieces, so why would Warner Brothers authorize it?"

Larger things have failed for smaller reasons. And this leaves aside
entirely the idea that just resurrecting the characters for More of
the Same would be a good idea. "What's Happening Now! on B5", indeed.
You did a stellar job of scattering those characters. What would be
the point?

Not that *I* have a stake in it, of course; B5 in season sets on DVD
at the price I more or less thought I could get is a wonderful thing.
Finally we're starting to have a record of a show that didn't ever
have a consistent air time. But if you ever do more with any of those
characters, especially Ivanova, I'll tune in. 

Rob


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 00:19:11 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 34

>But then there is the notion (maybe not the fact) that your word at an
>early stage can make the investors go away: "Joe stated publicly that
>you don't have all the pieces, so why should I fund it?" Or, worse
>(and not true based on what you wrote here), "Joe said you didn't have
>all the pieces, so why would Warner Brothers authorize it?"

One, you make the assumption that WB or anyone else would care what's written
in a newsgroup or in an interview.  They don't.  And wouldn't.  WB is also in
the money making business.  If someone comes to them with the money, wouldn't
matter what I said except that I'd look foolish (which I'm okay with, it's
happened before).  If the money's there, the deal is there; if not, not.  The
rest is utterly irrelevant.

There are two kinds of people, those who go public about things long before
they are even close to reality in order to try and get something going (which
almost never works), which gets all the fans heated up about something that's
as substantive as gossamer...and those who hold off saying anything until the
deal is set and signed, out of respect, conservativism, experience and a desire
not to get folks wound up about vague possibilities.  I subscribe to the
latter.  I've very rarely commented on *anything* until I knew it was a
reality, or even some time thereafter.  The few times I *have* said anything
before all the pieces were in place, it almost never came to pass...hence
reinforcing lesson #1 above.

 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2003 by synthetic worlds, ltd., 
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine 
and don't send me story ideas)