[B5JMS] two quickies from jms

[b5jms at cs.columbia.edu]

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: Den <etranger033 at yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 06:53:06 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 8

jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5) wrote in
news:20031211041450.26181.00000493 at mb-m15.aol.com: 

> So for those who were hoping for the best...your hopes will be
> realized.  It's just freaking magnificent.

Anyone want to take bets on the best picture oscar?


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 10:48:23 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 17

>Anyone want to take bets on the best picture oscar?
>

It's not likely; the Academy doesn't tend to recognize genre films in this
category.  I'm hoping that Jackson will get the award for Best Director, but
even that's a leap for the traditionally conservative Academy.

 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2003 by synthetic worlds, ltd., 
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine 
and don't send me story ideas)