[B5JMS] Amazing Spider-Man #510 (SPOILER SPACE--BIG REVELATION)

[b5jms at cs.columbia.edu]

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lines: 28
From: nedleedsjr at aol.com (NedLeedsjr)
Date: 16 Aug 2004 01:55:12 GMT

> jmsatb5 at aol.com

>>The letter does *not* say "I have two children, who are Gabriel and Sarah".
>>If Peter reads the letter and decides that Gwen's two children are Gabriel
>>and Sarah, he's not just reading the letter; he's drawing a conclusion.
>>Making a guess.
>
>But my POINT is that this IS a possibility given how it reads, and that your
>suggestion that ferrets could be involved is absurd because they are NOT any
>kind of possibility.  The letter COULD be saying they're her kids, that's
>certainly one implication, and they might NOT be her kids, another
>implication.
> So you investigate both POSSIBILITIES and then based on that investigation
>you
>come to a conclusion.
>
>Look...tell you what...why don't we wait until the next issue which resolves
>ALL of this in terms that couldn't be clearer?  Otherwise all we're doing is
>the comics version of debating how many angels can dance on the head of a
>pin. 
>
>(The answer to which, by the way, is "As many as want to.")
>
>
> jms

I'm still sticking with my original hypothesis that these 2 new villians are
the bastard children of Aunt May and the Mindworm.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lines: 15
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 16 Aug 2004 03:13:57 GMT

>I'm still sticking with my original hypothesis that these 2 new villians are
>the bastard children of Aunt May and the Mindworm.

Shit, there's a leak at the Marvel office....


 jms

(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2004 by synthetic worlds, ltd., 
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine 
and don't send me story ideas)