ATTN JMS: Choosing what to show (SPOILERS for 421)
B5JMS Poster
b5jms-owner at shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu
Wed Oct 22 06:27:49 EDT 1997
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: Ellen Caldera <ecaldera at airmail.net>
Date: 21 Oct 1997 01:42:16 -0400
Lines: 37
Spoilers below for 421: "Rising Star"
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
What a terrific way to wrap up the Clark era on Earth! An excellent
episode, from start to finish, with plenty of thought-provoking and
inspiring speeches thrown in for good measure.
One question, though: After all the time and care that you put into
slowly developing the relationship between John and Delenn, why did
you choose not to show their wedding onscreen? I can think of several
perfectly legitimate reasons for doing this and am mainly curious as
to what factors went into that decision.
Thanks!
- Ellen Caldera
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 21 Oct 1997 10:20:39 -0400
Lines: 51
>One question, though: After all the time and care that you put into
>slowly developing the relationship between John and Delenn, why did
>you choose not to show their wedding onscreen? I can think of several
>perfectly legitimate reasons for doing this and am mainly curious as
>to what factors went into that decision.
This was something I debated back and forth for quite some time. I finally
came to the idea of having it happen off-camera because I thought, frankly,
that it would come off as corny to show it; it would be an obvious appeal to
ratings and the like, and I tend to shy away from that.
jms
-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages go to the list maintainer,
-*** <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>. If you want to reply elsewhere, adjust
-*** the "To" field. The best way to reach JMS is to post to rastb5m, which
-*** can be done by sending email to <b5mod at deepthot.cary.nc.us>.
More information about the B5JMS
mailing list