ATTN JMS: Sequel theories/Pros & Cons
B5JMS Poster
b5jms-owner at shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu
Thu May 21 06:56:36 EDT 1998
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: Blair Leatherwood <bleatherwood at ibm.net>
Date: 19 May 1998 23:02:56 -0600
Lines: 12
Jms at B5 wrote:
> I already answered this in the course of my initial reply, by putting it into
> the context of what was the situation before, and what is different now.
>
> jms
This reminds me of the response given during Prime Minister's Question Time: I
refer the right honourable gentleman (or woman) to the response I gave some
moments before.
A very civilized response.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com (Jms at B5)
Date: 20 May 1998 09:33:52 -0600
Lines: 19
>This reminds me of the response given during Prime Minister's Question Time:
>I
>refer the right honourable gentleman (or woman) to the response I gave some
>moments before.
>
>A very civilized response.
Which is about where the civilized part ends...having watched a fair amount of
Prime Minister's Question Time on CSPAN, I have to say it beats professional
wrestling any day of the week.
I understand only about half of what's under discussion, but it's pretty damned
entertaining nonetheless.
jms
(jmsatb5 at aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com
-***
-*** B5JMS SUBSCRIBERS: Replies to messages go to the list maintainer,
-*** <b5jms-owner at cs.columbia.edu>. If you want to reply elsewhere, adjust
-*** the "To" field. See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/b5jms/ for all
-*** other information about this list.
More information about the B5JMS
mailing list